Which of the following would be most consistent with a GRIT strategy?

A) announcing that even a small attack on an ally will result in a nuclear attack on the enemy
B) announcing that defense expenditures will be cut by 5 percent and inviting the enemy to do likewise
C) announcing that one has formed an alliance with several countries encircling the enemy
D) announcing that the opposing party's invasion of a neutral country will be challenged in an international court of law

GRIT (Graduated and Reciprocated Initiatives in Tension-Reduction) strategy involves taking small steps towards disarmament and peace, and inviting the other party to reciprocate. Announcing a 5 percent cut in defense expenditures and inviting the enemy to do the same would be a small step towards disarmament and would invite the other party to reciprocate, making it consistent with a GRIT strategy. The other options involve threats of violence or legal action and are not consistent with a GRIT strategy.