Which of the following arguments refutes Carr's claim that business strategy is analogous to poker strategy?

A) Because good poker playing often involves concealing information and bluffing or deception,these rules ought to apply to business transactions
B) If an executive refuses to bluff periodically he or she is probably ignoring opportunities permitted under the "rules" of business
C) Most games do not legitimize deception,and therefore business should not be analogous to a game that does legitimize deception
D) Bluffing,exaggeration and concealment are legitimate ways for corporations to maximize their self interest
E) None of the above arguments refute Carr's claim

Question

Gabbi Sablan · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : C, Explanation :  This argument directly refutes Carr's analogy by pointing out that most games do not legitimize deception, which undermines the idea that poker strategy is applicable to business strategy.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions