Asked by alyssia rouse on May 08, 2024
Verified
The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission
(2010) was significant because it
A) dramatically decreased the flow of money from interest groups and Super PACs into politics and electoral campaigns.
B) dramatically increased the flow of money from interest groups and Super PACs into politics and electoral campaigns.
C) prohibited Super PACs from donating to electoral campaigns but increased the amount of money interest groups could contribute.
D) prohibited interest groups from donating to electoral campaigns but increased the amount of money Super PACs could contribute.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
A landmark Supreme Court case that ruled limitations on corporate and union spending in political campaigns are unconstitutional, significantly impacting campaign financing.
Super PACs
Political action committees operating independently can secure unlimited financial contributions from corporations, unions, and individuals, though they are restricted from direct collaboration with parties or candidates.
Electoral Campaigns
The organized effort carried out by political candidates and parties to win support and votes.
- Comprehend the impact of the Supreme Court's decisions on campaign finance, specifically Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
Verified Answer
AY
Ahmad YassineMay 14, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The Citizens United decision dramatically increased the flow of money from interest groups and Super PACs into politics and electoral campaigns by removing restrictions on their ability to spend money in support of specific candidates. This led to the rise of Super PACs, which can spend unlimited amounts of money on independent expenditures to support or oppose candidates.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the impact of the Supreme Court's decisions on campaign finance, specifically Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.