Asked by Amber Thomas on Jun 14, 2024

verifed

Verified

The Supreme Court ruled that the government could not restrict independent expenditures by corporations or unions to political campaigns in

A) Buckley v.Valeo (1976) .
B) Bush v.Gore (2000) .
C) Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission (2010) .
D) FCC v.Pacifica Foundation (1978) .

Independent Expenditures

Money spent by individuals or organizations to support or oppose political candidates or issues without coordination with the candidates or their campaigns.

Political Campaigns

Organized efforts to influence the decision-making process within a specific group, often associated with candidates running for political office.

  • Grasp the legal landscape of campaign finance in the United States, including key Supreme Court decisions.
verifed

Verified Answer

AM
Abdul Manan JalbaniJun 17, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) that the government could not restrict independent expenditures by corporations or unions to political campaigns. This decision overturned provisions of the McCain-Feingold Act that prohibited such spending by corporations and unions within 30 days of a primary election and 60 days of a general election. The ruling was based on the First Amendment's protection of free speech and has had significant implications for campaign finance laws and the role of money in politics.