Asked by Carson White on Jun 02, 2024
Verified
The Supreme Court's decision in Printz v.United States was important because it declared that
A) state and local officials could not be required to administer a federal regulatory program.
B) state and local officials could be required to administer a federal regulatory program.
C) the federal government could not regulate the working conditions or hours of labor for businesses engaged solely in intrastate commerce.
D) the federal government could regulate the working conditions and hours of labor for businesses engaged solely in intrastate commerce.
Printz v. United States
A landmark Supreme Court case that decided on the constitutionality of certain interim provisions of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.
Federal Regulatory Program
A system of rules and regulations established by the federal government to control and supervise specific activities, industries, or sectors.
State Officials
Individuals holding positions of authority in government at the state level, responsible for implementing laws and policies.
- Assess the Supreme Court's contributions to shaping and defining the principles of federalism.
Verified Answer
EL
Ethan LocklearJun 08, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
In Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court declared that the federal government could not require state and local officials to administer a federal regulatory program, as it violated the Tenth Amendment's principles of dual sovereignty and limited federal power. Therefore, the correct choice is A.
Learning Objectives
- Assess the Supreme Court's contributions to shaping and defining the principles of federalism.