Asked by Cassandra Baitley on Jun 17, 2024

verifed

Verified

Negotiators sometimes begin to rely too heavily on arbitration as a means of settling their contract disputes, rather than working hard to come to their own agreement. This is known as the chilling effect.

Chilling Effect

A chilling effect occurs when the exercise of rights or freedoms is discouraged by the threat of legal sanction or other negative consequences, leading to self-censorship or avoidance of certain actions.

Arbitration

A method of dispute resolution where an impartial third party, the arbitrator, makes a binding decision to resolve a dispute outside of court.

Contract Disputes

Conflicts that arise over the interpretation, fulfillment, or breach of a contract between two or more parties.

  • Evaluate how different tactics and strategies in bargaining affect the outcomes of negotiations.
verifed

Verified Answer

JB
Jordan BalserJun 23, 2024
Final Answer :
False
Explanation :
The term you're referring to is actually known as the "narcotizing effect," not the chilling effect. The chilling effect refers to the discouragement of the legitimate exercise of natural and legal rights by the threat of legal sanction, whereas the narcotizing effect describes how people may become passive and overly reliant on a particular solution or system, such as arbitration, instead of actively seeking their own resolutions.