Why would it be wrong simply to equate "reality" and what is most true with what is most evident to our senses? Give an example.

Sometimes what is evident to our senses turns out to be an illusion, and what is obvious turns out to be untrue. For example, scientists tell us that our belief that the chair is obviously and evidently a solid object is not correct, because the chair is really an enormous complex of invisible particles, atoms, and molecules in various arrangements. (There may be other examples, including ones not found in the text.)