Write a fictional argumentative dialogue between two characters who disagree about the basic nature of reality. The two characters can defend any metaphysical viewpoint, including ones developed in Chapter 4. However, any option ought to be defended or criticized with arguments. Aside from the option you are arguing for and against, your dialogue should address five other philosophers, and/or frameworks discussed in the chapter. You can use these as a resource for arguments or simply as a means of clarifying your viewpoint. The dialogue can end with agreement, with agreeing to disagree, or with arriving at a new viewpoint that synthesizes their starting standpoints. You may also stage the dialogue as an oral presentation before your class, or make a video of it.

Question

Write a fictional argumentative dialogue between two characters who disagree about the basic nature of reality. The two characters can defend any metaphysical viewpoint, including ones developed in Chapter 4. However, any option ought to be defended or criticized with arguments.   Aside from the option you are arguing for and against, your dialogue should address five other philosophers, and/or frameworks discussed in the chapter.   You can use these as a resource for arguments or simply as a means of clarifying your viewpoint. The dialogue can end with agreement, with agreeing to disagree, or with arriving at a new viewpoint that synthesizes their starting standpoints. You may also stage the dialogue as an oral presentation before your class, or make a video of it.

Zybrea Knight · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : ​ An argumentative dialogue that can draw on, but is not limited to, Chapter 4.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions