Asked by I LOVE TRAVEL on May 26, 2024

verifed

Verified

Use a truth table to answer the following question.Which, if any, set of truth values assigned to the atomic sentences shows that the following argument is invalid? A∪BA∼B\begin{array} { l } A \cup B \\\frac { A } { ∼B }\end{array}ABBA

A) A: T B: T
B) A: T B: F
C) A: F B: T
D) A: F B: F
E) None-the argument is valid.

Atomic Sentences

A type of sentence that contains no logical connectors and expresses a simple proposition.

Truth Values

In logic, the truth or falsity of a statement, commonly categorized as either true or false.

Truth Table

A mathematical table used in logic to determine whether a proposition is true or false under every possible combination of its variables.

  • Explore the foundational elements of argument validity.
  • Become skilled at constructing and analyzing truth tables.
  • Identify logical connectors and their impact on argument structure.
verifed

Verified Answer

RS
Rahul SinghMay 29, 2024
Final Answer :
E
Explanation :
The argument is valid because there is no row in the truth table where the premises are true and the conclusion is false. The argument structure is such that if AAA is true, then ∼B∼BB (not B) must also be true for the conclusion to follow. However, since the premises include A∪BA \cup BAB (A or B), and the conclusion is ∼B∼BB , the only way the argument could be invalid is if both AAA and BBB were false, which is not an option given the structure of the argument. Therefore, the argument is valid under all possible truth values for AAA and BBB .