Asked by Felicia Thompson on Jul 21, 2024

verifed

Verified

Two individuals, A and B, are free to engage in trade of clothing and food. Initially, A has 12 units of clothing and 9 units of food, and B has 8 units of clothing and 11 units of food. The individuals have the following utility functions in clothing C and food F:
UA = 0.15QC ∙ QF
UB = 0.08QC ∙ QF
where QF represents units of food, QC represents units of clothing, and U represents utility. Determine if a mutually beneficial trade is possible between A and B. If so, who would trade for what?

Utility Functions

Mathematical representations that indicate the level of satisfaction or utility an individual receives from consuming different bundles of goods and services.

Clothing

Textile-based materials worn on the body, primarily used for protection, modesty, and decoration.

Food

Nutrient-rich substances consumed by organisms to provide energy and maintain life.

  • Analyze scenarios involving trade among individuals to identify mutually beneficial exchanges.
verifed

Verified Answer

AG
Alice GathoniJul 22, 2024
Final Answer :
If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRSA of clothing for food for A will equal the MRSB of clothing for B. If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = 0.75 If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = If, and only if, an efficient allocation exists, the MRS<sup>A</sup> of clothing for food for A will equal the MRS<sup>B</sup> of clothing for B.   =   =   =   =   =   = 0.75   =   =   = 1.375 In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process. = 1.375
In this situation the MRS for A does not equal MRS for B; consequently there is a potential for mutually beneficial trade. Individual A is willing to give up at most 0.75 units of food to get one additional unit of clothing. Individual B is willing to give up at most 1.375 units of food to get one unit of clothing (or give up 0.727 units of clothing to get one unit of food). Therefore a mutually beneficial exchange can be made. A would trade clothing for food and B would trade food for clothing. The terms of trade would be between 0.75 and 1.375 depending upon the exact bargaining process.