Asked by Joshua Sardon on May 09, 2024

verifed

Verified

The following argument is an instance of one of the five inference forms MP, MT, HS, DS, Conj.Identify the form. (W⊃W) ∪(D∨S) ∼W⊃D‾D∨S\begin{array} { l } ( W \supset \mathrm { W } ) \cup ( \mathrm { D } \vee \mathrm { S } ) \\\underline{\sim \mathrm { W } \supset \mathrm { D } }\\\mathrm { D } \vee \mathrm { S }\end{array}(WW) (DS) WDDS

A) MP
B) MT
C) HS
D) DS
E) Conj

Inference Forms

Logical structures that guide the transition from premises to conclusions in reasoning.

MP

Member of Parliament, an individual elected to represent a geographic area in the parliament.

  • Analyze argument structure for logical validity.
  • Determine the role of disjunction within logical reasoning and its consequences for the resulting conclusion.
verifed

Verified Answer

FP
Fatima PerezMay 13, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The argument is an instance of Disjunctive Syllogism (DS), which allows one to infer one disjunct when the other is denied. Here, the denial of ∼W\sim WW (not W) leads to the conclusion D∨SD \vee SDS .