Asked by Jason Benfield on May 09, 2024
Verified
The following argument is an instance of one of the five inference forms MP, MT, HS, DS, Conj.Identify the form. (R⊃R) ⊃(D≡∼U) R⊃RD≡∼U\begin{array} { l } ( \mathrm { R } \supset \mathrm { R } ) \supset ( \mathrm { D } \equiv \sim \mathrm { U } ) \\\frac { \mathrm { R } \supset \mathrm { R } } { \mathrm { D } \equiv \sim \mathrm { U } }\end{array}(R⊃R) ⊃(D≡∼U) D≡∼UR⊃R
A) MP
B) MT
C) HS
D) DS
E) Conj
MP
Stands for "Member of Parliament," but in a logical context, it refers to a deductive pattern of reasoning where a specific conclusion is inferred from a general rule and a specific case.
Conj
An abbreviation for "Conjunction," a logical operator that connects two conditions or propositions where both must be true.
- Secure an understanding and pinpoint the quintessential five patterns of logical deduction: Modus Ponens (MP), Modus Tollens (MT), Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), Disjunctive Syllogism (DS), and Conjunction (Conj).
Verified Answer
BW
Britney WilliamsMay 13, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
This argument is an instance of Modus Ponens (MP), which takes the form: If P, then Q; P; therefore, Q. Here, (R⊃R) ( R \supset R ) (R⊃R) is P, and (D≡∼U) ( D \equiv \sim U ) (D≡∼U) is Q.
Learning Objectives
- Secure an understanding and pinpoint the quintessential five patterns of logical deduction: Modus Ponens (MP), Modus Tollens (MT), Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), Disjunctive Syllogism (DS), and Conjunction (Conj).