Asked by Jason Benfield on May 09, 2024

verifed

Verified

The following argument is an instance of one of the five inference forms MP, MT, HS, DS, Conj.Identify the form. (R⊃R) ⊃(D≡∼U) R⊃RD≡∼U\begin{array} { l } ( \mathrm { R } \supset \mathrm { R } ) \supset ( \mathrm { D } \equiv \sim \mathrm { U } ) \\\frac { \mathrm { R } \supset \mathrm { R } } { \mathrm { D } \equiv \sim \mathrm { U } }\end{array}(RR) (D≡∼U) D≡∼URR

A) MP
B) MT
C) HS
D) DS
E) Conj

MP

Stands for "Member of Parliament," but in a logical context, it refers to a deductive pattern of reasoning where a specific conclusion is inferred from a general rule and a specific case.

Conj

An abbreviation for "Conjunction," a logical operator that connects two conditions or propositions where both must be true.

  • Secure an understanding and pinpoint the quintessential five patterns of logical deduction: Modus Ponens (MP), Modus Tollens (MT), Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), Disjunctive Syllogism (DS), and Conjunction (Conj).
verifed

Verified Answer

BW
Britney WilliamsMay 13, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
This argument is an instance of Modus Ponens (MP), which takes the form: If P, then Q; P; therefore, Q. Here, (R⊃R) ( R \supset R ) (RR) is P, and (D≡∼U) ( D \equiv \sim U ) (D≡∼U) is Q.