Asked by Jahhlovey Angella on May 03, 2024
Verified
The following argument is an instance of one of the five inference forms MP, MT, HS, DS, Conj.Identify the form. (M⊃P) ⊃(L∨S) (L∨S) ⊃(T≡W) (M⊃P) ⊃(T≡W) \begin{array} { l } ( \mathrm { M } \supset \mathrm { P } ) \supset ( \mathrm { L } \vee \mathrm { S } ) \\( \mathrm { L } \vee \mathrm { S } ) \supset ( \mathrm { T } \equiv W ) \\( \mathrm { M } \supset \mathrm { P } ) \supset ( \mathrm { T } \equiv W ) \end{array}(M⊃P) ⊃(L∨S) (L∨S) ⊃(T≡W) (M⊃P) ⊃(T≡W)
A) MP
B) MT
C) HS
D) DS
E) Conj
Inference Forms
Patterns or templates of reasoning that show the logical connection between premises and conclusion.
MP
An abbreviation that could refer to Modus Ponens, a logical form where from premises of the form "If P, then Q" and "P", it's concluded that "Q".
MT
Another term for Modus Tollens, it is the form of logical argument implying the inverse of a conclusion based on the negation of its consequence.
- Learn and classify the five core inferential models: Modus Ponens (MP), Modus Tollens (MT), Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), Disjunctive Syllogism (DS), and Conjunction (Conj).
Verified Answer
BF
Bailey ForemanMay 05, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
This argument is an instance of Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), which involves three conditionals where the consequent of one conditional is the antecedent of another, leading to a conclusion that connects the first antecedent to the final consequent.
Learning Objectives
- Learn and classify the five core inferential models: Modus Ponens (MP), Modus Tollens (MT), Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), Disjunctive Syllogism (DS), and Conjunction (Conj).