Asked by Hannah Brown on May 04, 2024
Verified
Suppose that, during jury selection for a burglary trial, the lawyer for the prosecution determines that she does not want a potential juror named Ingrid Malone on the jury. Ingrid has stated that she has been in and out of mental institutions her whole life and that she sees nothing wrong with a little burglary now and then. Ingrid even offers up the idea that "all burglars should be free to burgle." The prosecution lawyer suggests to the judge that Ingrid is highly biased and should be removed from the jury panel. The judge agrees and has her quickly removed. This process is known as ____.
A) venire
B) voir dire
C) challenge for cause
D) peremptory challenge
Challenge For Cause
A legal reason provided in court to disqualify a prospective juror, based on evidence that they may not be able to be impartial.
Voir Dire
A legal process in which prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases before being chosen to sit on a jury.
Peremptory Challenge
A legal procedure allowing attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason, typically used in court to dismiss jurors believed to be biased.
- Elucidate the strategies and consequences of selecting a jury, emphasizing both peremptory challenges and challenges for cause.
Verified Answer
BM
Brooke McIntoshMay 07, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
This process is known as a "challenge for cause," where a potential juror is removed due to a specific reason indicating they cannot be impartial, such as bias or preconceived notions about the case.
Learning Objectives
- Elucidate the strategies and consequences of selecting a jury, emphasizing both peremptory challenges and challenges for cause.