Asked by Kunwar Singh on Jul 13, 2024
Verified
Janet is called for jury duty and is selected for possible service on a jury. However, when the defendant's attorney sees her, he notices that she is wearing a green dress. Both the defendant and the defendant's attorney hate green dresses, so they strike her name from the jury. This is:
A) a valid challenge for cause.
B) a valid peremptory challenge.
C) not a valid challenge.
D) a valid challenge for cause, but it can be overcome if the plaintiff's attorney makes an offer of proof to the judge.
Peremptory Challenge
During jury selection, attorneys are given the privilege to dismiss a specified number of would-be jurors with no need to explain their reasoning.
Challenge for Cause
A procedure during jury selection allowing attorneys to exclude a potential juror if they can prove the juror's bias or inability to serve impartially.
Valid Challenge
A legitimate objection or dispute presented against an existing condition or decision, often within a legal context.
- Describe the jury selection process, including challenges for cause and peremptory challenges, and understand the legal implications of exclusion based on race or gender.
Verified Answer
JP
Jesse PavelJul 14, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a reason. The dislike for a green dress, while not a legally sound reason, falls under the broad discretion allowed by peremptory challenges.
Learning Objectives
- Describe the jury selection process, including challenges for cause and peremptory challenges, and understand the legal implications of exclusion based on race or gender.