Asked by Laura-Leigh Holley on Jul 18, 2024
Verified
In United States v.Park,what was the United States Supreme Court's ruling regarding the criminal liability of the defendant Park,corporate president of a national food-chain corporation?
A) That the defendant could not be held liable because it could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew warehouse employees were failing to take proper steps to ensure sanitary conditions.
B) That the defendant could not be held liable because it could not be proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he knew warehouse employees were failing to take proper steps to ensure sanitary conditions.
C) That the defendant could not be held liable because he did not personally cause the contamination.
D) That the defendant could be held liable because he hid evidence of the offenses.
E) That the defendant could be held liable because he failed to ensure his company's compliance with the law.
Criminal Liability
The legal responsibility for a criminal offense, with the potential for penalties like incarceration.
Corporate President
A high-ranking executive in a corporation, often responsible for the overall management and day-to-day operations of the company.
Sanitary Conditions
The state of cleanliness and hygiene that prevents health hazards and ensures a safe environment for living or working.
- Understand the fundamentals of criminal responsibility for executives in corporations.
Verified Answer
WS
WHITNEY SCOTTJul 23, 2024
Final Answer :
E
Explanation :
In United States v.Park,the United States Supreme Court ruled that corporate executives,including the defendant Park,can be criminally liable for failing to ensure a company's compliance with the law.
Learning Objectives
- Understand the fundamentals of criminal responsibility for executives in corporations.