Asked by Julian Cintron on May 16, 2024

verifed

Verified

In the case in the text,Olmstead v.Saint Paul Public Schools,the court held that:

A) Olmstead could not demonstrate that his free will was overcome.
B) Olmstead's resignation was revocable because when he resigned he was under duress.
C) Olmstead was under duress when the District threated to file termination charges against Olmstead when it had no intention or grounds to do so.
D) the District illegally promised to not report Olmstead if he resigned.

Duress

A circumstance where someone carries out a behavior because they have faced threats, violence, or various forms of compulsion.

Free Will

The concept or belief that humans are capable of making choices or decisions independently of any pre-existing destiny, fate, or divine intervention.

Termination Charges

Fees that may be imposed for ending a service or contract earlier than specified in the agreement.

  • Comprehend the outcomes associated with undue pressure and forced agreement in legal contract contexts.
verifed

Verified Answer

CR
Carl Ryan TuckerMay 16, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The court held that Olmsted could not demonstrate that his free will was overcome and no evidence supported the allegation that the District made an unlawful threat.