In a case involving an ultrahazardous or abnormally dangerous activity,the plaintiff must prove recklessness on the defendant's part.Any lower fault standard would be unfair to the defendant in such a case.

Question

Zybrea Knight · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : False, Explanation :  Abnormally dangerous (or ultrahazardous)activities are those necessarily involving a risk of harm that cannot be eliminated by the exercise of reasonable care.The court will hold a defendant to a higher standard for willingly conducting dangerous activities.that the defendant knew could be potentially harmful to others.The plaintiff is not required to prove recklessness on the defendant's part.

In a case involving an ultrahazardous or abnormally dangerous activity,the plaintiff must prove recklessness on the defendant's part.Any lower fault standard would be unfair to the defendant in such a case.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions