Asked by Morgan Beasley on May 06, 2024
Verified
Phil decided to rescue Bobo,the dancing bear,from a traveling circus that was closing its business.Although Bobo was a well-behaved grizzly bear,Phil took great care to make sure that Bobo would not escape from his yard by reinforcing the yard's fence with steel and padlocking the gate.One day,without notice,Bobo rushed the fence,knocked the padlock off the gate,and escaped from Phil's yard.Bobo lunged at a young child in the neighborhood,injuring him.Based on these facts:
A) Phil will be liable,only if he breached a duty of due care owed to the child.
B) Phil will be liable if the harm that resulted to the child was foreseeable to Phil.
C) Phil will be liable,regardless of the steps that he took to secure the yard.
D) Phil will most likely not be liable.
Duty of Due Care
A legal obligation to exercise a reasonable level of care to avoid causing harm to others.
Grizzly Bear
A large species of brown bear inhabiting North America, recognized for its size and significant strength.
Foreseeable Harm
A concept in law referring to the anticipation of harm that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would expect.
- Comprehend the concept of strict liability and how it differs from negligence.
Verified Answer
MN
Merna NaamoMay 12, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The owners of trespassing livestock and the keepers of naturally dangerous wild animals were among the first classes of defendants on whom the courts imposed strict liability.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the concept of strict liability and how it differs from negligence.