In 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal sentencing guidelines were not mandatory but should serve only as recommendations judges should use in their decisions.

Question

In 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal sentencing guidelines were not mandatory but should serve only as recommendations judges should use in their decisions.​

LeeAnn Maruna · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : True, Explanation :  In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Booker that the federal sentencing guidelines were no longer mandatory, but instead should serve only as advisory guidelines for judges to consider in their sentencing decisions.

In 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal sentencing guidelines were not mandatory but should serve only as recommendations judges should use in their decisions.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions

In 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal sentencing guidelines were not mandatory but should serve only as recommendations judges should use in their decisions.​

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions

In 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal sentencing guidelines were not mandatory but should serve only as recommendations judges should use in their decisions.