Asked by Andrew Grasso on May 14, 2024

verifed

Verified

Bochenski Mechanical Corporation has developed a new industrial grinder-model UF-48-that has been designed to outperform a competitor's best-selling industrial grinder. Model UF-48 has a useful life of 80,000 hours of service and its operating cost is $1.95 per hour. In contrast, the competitor's product has a useful life of 20,000 hours of service and has operating costs that average $2.75 per hour. The competitor's industrial grinder sells for $148,000. Bochenski has not yet established a selling price for model UF-48.
Required:
From a value-based pricing standpoint what is the differentiation value offered by model UF-48 relative to the competitor's offering for each 80,000 hours of service?

Value-based Pricing

A pricing strategy where prices are set primarily on the perceived value to the customer rather than on the cost of the product or historical prices.

Industrial Grinder

A heavy-duty machine designed for industrial applications, such as grinding metals or plastics.

Operating Cost

Expenses associated with the day-to-day operations of a business, excluding costs related to direct material and direct labor.

  • Gain an understanding of value-based pricing and its implementation in pricing products.
  • Assess the distinctiveness value of a product vis-à-vis its competitors.
  • Recognize the role of operating costs in contributing to the total cost of ownership for a product.
verifed

Verified Answer

EC
Emily CarricoMay 15, 2024
Final Answer :
The differentiation value has two components. First, customers who purchase a model UF-48 rather than the competing alternative would avoid the need to buy four industrial grinders for ${{[a(3)]:#,###}} rather than just one UF-48 to achieve {{[a(1)]:#,###}} hours of service. This is a savings of ${{[a(8)]:#,###}} (= {{[a(7)]:#,###}} × ${{[a(3)]:#,###}}) for the additional industrial grinders that would have to be purchased. Second, customers who purchase a model UF-48 rather than the competing alternative would realize operating cost savings computed as follows:
The differentiation value has two components. First, customers who purchase a model UF-48 rather than the competing alternative would avoid the need to buy four industrial grinders for ${{[a(3)]:#,###}} rather than just one UF-48 to achieve {{[a(1)]:#,###}} hours of service. This is a savings of ${{[a(8)]:#,###}} (= {{[a(7)]:#,###}} × ${{[a(3)]:#,###}}) for the additional industrial grinders that would have to be purchased. Second, customers who purchase a model UF-48 rather than the competing alternative would realize operating cost savings computed as follows:     Differentiation value = ${{[a(8)]:#,###}} + ${{[a(11)]:#,###}} = ${{[a(12)]:#,###}}
Differentiation value = ${{[a(8)]:#,###}} + ${{[a(11)]:#,###}} = ${{[a(12)]:#,###}}