Asked by Marco-Amar Drummond on Jun 28, 2024

verifed

Verified

A paper company dumps nondegradable waste into a river that flows by the firm's plant. The firm estimates its production function to be:
Q = 6KW,
where Q = annual paper production measured in pounds, A paper company dumps nondegradable waste into a river that flows by the firm's plant. The firm estimates its production function to be: Q = 6KW, where Q = annual paper production measured in pounds,   of capital, and   of polluted water dumped into the river per year. The marginal products of capital and labor are given as follows: MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K The firm currently faces no environmental regulation in dumping waste into the river. Without regulation, it costs the firm $7.50 per gallon dumped. The firm estimates a $30 per hour rental rate on capital. The operating budget for capital and waste water is $300,000 per year. a. Determine the firm's optimal ratio of waste water to capital. b. Given the firm's $300,000 budget, how much capital and waste water should the firm employ? How much output will the firm produce? c. The state environmental protection agency plans to impose a $7.50 effluent fee for each gallon that is dumped. Assuming that the firm intends to maintain its pre-fee output, how much capital and waste water should the firm employ? How much will the firm pay in effluent fees? What happens to the firm's cost as a result of the effluent fee? of capital, and A paper company dumps nondegradable waste into a river that flows by the firm's plant. The firm estimates its production function to be: Q = 6KW, where Q = annual paper production measured in pounds,   of capital, and   of polluted water dumped into the river per year. The marginal products of capital and labor are given as follows: MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K The firm currently faces no environmental regulation in dumping waste into the river. Without regulation, it costs the firm $7.50 per gallon dumped. The firm estimates a $30 per hour rental rate on capital. The operating budget for capital and waste water is $300,000 per year. a. Determine the firm's optimal ratio of waste water to capital. b. Given the firm's $300,000 budget, how much capital and waste water should the firm employ? How much output will the firm produce? c. The state environmental protection agency plans to impose a $7.50 effluent fee for each gallon that is dumped. Assuming that the firm intends to maintain its pre-fee output, how much capital and waste water should the firm employ? How much will the firm pay in effluent fees? What happens to the firm's cost as a result of the effluent fee? of polluted water dumped into the river per year. The marginal products of capital and labor are given as follows:
MPK = 6W MPW = 6K
The firm currently faces no environmental regulation in dumping waste into the river. Without regulation, it costs the firm $7.50 per gallon dumped. The firm estimates a $30 per hour rental rate on capital. The operating budget for capital and waste water is $300,000 per year.
a. Determine the firm's optimal ratio of waste water to capital.
b. Given the firm's $300,000 budget, how much capital and waste water should the firm employ? How much output will the firm produce?
c. The state environmental protection agency plans to impose a $7.50 effluent fee for each gallon that is dumped. Assuming that the firm intends to maintain its pre-fee output, how much capital and waste water should the firm employ? How much will the firm pay in effluent fees? What happens to the firm's cost as a result of the effluent fee?

Nondegradable Waste

Waste materials that cannot be broken down or decomposed by natural processes, leading to long-term environmental pollution.

Environmental Regulation

Rules and standards set by governments to control activities that cause environmental harm, aiming to protect the environment and public health.

Production Function

A mathematical relationship expressing the amount of output produced as a function of the quantities of various inputs.

  • Calculate and interpret the effects of environmental regulations on firm costs and production decisions.
verifed

Verified Answer

MU
Mounika UppalaJul 01, 2024
Final Answer :
a.MPW = 6K
MPK = 6W
MRTS = a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. = a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. Rate of water charge to price of capital: a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. = a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. = .25
Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. = 0.25, K = 0.25W
b.C = PWW + PKK
300,000 = 7.50W + 30K
Recall K = 0.25W
300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W)
300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W
W = 20,000 gallons
K = 0.25W
K = 0.25(20,000)
K = 5000
Q = 6(5000)(20,000)
Q = 600,000,000
c.PW becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees).
Ratio of input price is a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. = a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. = 0.5
MRTS = a.MP<sub>W</sub> = 6K MP<sub>K</sub> = 6W MRTS =   =   Rate of water charge to price of capital:   =   = .25 Equating MRTS to ratio of input prices   = 0.25, K = 0.25W b.C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K 300,000 = 7.50W + 30K Recall K = 0.25W 300,000 = 7.5W + 30(0.25W) 300,000 = 7.5W + 7.5W W = 20,000 gallons K = 0.25W K = 0.25(20,000) K = 5000 Q = 6(5000)(20,000) Q = 600,000,000 c.P<sub>W</sub> becomes $15 (7.50 previous cost + effluent fees). Ratio of input price is   =   = 0.5 MRTS =   Hold Q constant at 600,000,000 Q = 6KW K = 0.5W 600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W) 600,000,000 = 3W<sup>2 </sup> 200,000,000 = W<sup>2 </sup> <sup> </sup>W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142 K = 0.5(14,142) K = 7071 Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071. Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5 Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level) Cost after effluent fee is C = P<sub>W</sub>W + P<sub>K</sub>K where P<sub>W</sub> = 15 (including fee) P<sub>K</sub> = 30 C = 15(14142) + 30(7071) C = 212,130 + 213,130 C = $424,260 Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260. Hold Q constant at 600,000,000
Q = 6KW
K = 0.5W
600,000,000 = 6(0.5W)(W)
600,000,000 = 3W2
200,000,000 = W2
W = 14,142.13 or W = 14,142
K = 0.5(14,142)
K = 7071
Water usage falls from 20,000 to 14,142 while capital rises from 5000 to 7071.
Effluent fee is 7.5 × 7071 = $53,032.5
Cost prior to effluent fee was $300,000 (from isocost level)
Cost after effluent fee is
C = PWW + PKK
where PW = 15 (including fee)
PK = 30
C = 15(14142) + 30(7071)
C = 212,130 + 213,130
C = $424,260
Cost rises from $300,000 to $424,260.