Asked by Jeanette Retana on Jun 22, 2024

verifed

Verified

A clothing chain is considering two different locations for a new retail outlet. The organization has identified the four factors listed in the following table as the basis for evaluation, and has assigned weights as shown on the right side of this table. The manager has rated each location on each factor, on a 100-point basis (higher scores are better), as shown in the right-hand table.
a. Calculate the composite score for each alternative location.
b. Which site should be chosen?
c. Are you concerned about the sensitivity and subjectivity of this solution? Comment.
 Weight  Kelowna  Vernon  Income 0.58261 Growth 0.37892 Public Transit 0.084778 Labour Cost 0.127753\begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | } \hline & \text { Weight } & { \text { Kelowna } } & \text { Vernon } \\\hline \text { Income } & 0.5 & 82 & 61 \\\hline \text { Growth } & 0.3 & 78 & 92 \\\hline \text { Public Transit } & 0.08 & 47 & 78 \\\hline \text { Labour Cost } & 0.12 & 77 & 53 \\\hline\end{array} Income  Growth  Public Transit  Labour Cost  Weight 0.50.30.080.12 Kelowna 82784777 Vernon 61927853

Composite Score

An overall score derived from combining several individual scores, often used in assessments or evaluations.

Public Transit

A system of various transport modes such as buses and trains operated by a city or region to provide a shared travel service to the public.

Labour Cost

The total amount of money that businesses have to pay to their employees, encompassing wages, benefits, and taxes.

  • Acquire an understanding of the fundamental principles guiding the selection of facility locations and the factor rating technique.
  • Apprehend the effect of attributing weights to factors on outcomes in location decision-making.
verifed

Verified Answer

DJ
Diamond JacksonJun 26, 2024
Final Answer :
The higher rated site is Kelowna, 77.4 to 70.7. There is a margin of several points, which should overcome most levels of subjectivity. The site factor scores are quite different, so that a small swing in weights could produce swings in scores of a few points, but probably not the seven necessary to reverse the findings.
 Total 1 Kelowna  Vernon  Weighted sum 77.470.7 Weighted average 77.470.7\begin{array} { | l | l | r | r | } \hline \text { Total } & 1 & \text { Kelowna } & \text { Vernon } \\\hline \text { Weighted sum } & & 77.4 & 70.7 \\\hline \text { Weighted average } & & 77.4 & 70.7 \\\hline\end{array} Total  Weighted sum  Weighted average 1 Kelowna 77.477.4 Vernon 70.770.7