Asked by William Knott on Apr 27, 2024
Verified
Why was the original person-situation debate ill-conceived?
A) It is unreasonable to assume that typical or usual personality tendencies will predict behavior perfectly across the vast variety of situations in which people find themselves.
B) Personality had not yet been established as an identifiable discipline in the 1960s; any outcomes based on personality measures were tentative at best.
C) Nature-versus-nurture is a much more important question to ask than whether it is the person or the situation that determines behavior.
D) The situations social psychologists investigated were usually mundane or trivial; high-impact situations were needed to reveal the true contributions of traits and the situation.
Social Psychologists
Scientists who study how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others.
- Comprehend the historical development and debates within the field of personality psychology, including the person-situation debate.
Verified Answer
MA
Michael AnisimovApr 30, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The original person-situation debate was ill-conceived because it is unrealistic to expect personality traits to predict behavior perfectly across all situations. Situations also have an impact on behavior, and the interaction between personality and situational factors needs to be considered.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the historical development and debates within the field of personality psychology, including the person-situation debate.
Related questions
The View That Stable Personality Traits Predict Behavior Versus the ...
Beginning in the 1960s, Many Personality Psychologists Objected to the ...
The Person-Situation Debate Caused a Crisis in the Field of ...
Which Social Psychologist Conducted a Well-Known and Controversial Experiment That ...
Beginning in the 1960s, Social Psychologists Found Compelling Evidence That ...