Asked by Cammie Ericson on Jun 28, 2024
Verified
Why was political rhetoric so passionate and divisive during the 1790s?
A) Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr joined forces in trying to form their own political party separate from the Federalists and Republicans.
B) The United States would not have a national debt until the 1800s; all war debts following the Revolution remained squarely with the states.
C) Americans feared that the ideals of the Revolution would be betrayed as America faced the realities of governance.
D) Religious tensions that had been a secondary concern during the War for Independence came to dominate all other concerns.
E) Prominent newspaper editors later found to be British agents deliberately sowed dissension and soon nearly sparked another war.
Political Rhetoric
The art of persuasive speaking or writing, often utilized by politicians and public leaders to influence public opinion, advocate for policies, or articulate visions and ideals.
Revolution
A fundamental change in political power or organizational structures that takes place in a relatively short period of time, often accompanied by violence or the overthrow of an existing government.
Betrayed
An act of disloyalty or treachery, violating trust or faith.
- Examine the causes and effects of passionate and divisive political rhetoric in the 1790s.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Examine the causes and effects of passionate and divisive political rhetoric in the 1790s.
Related questions
Which of the Following Was True of Newspapers in America ...
Which Statement Is True About the Alien and Sedition Acts ...
This 1964 Republican Presidential Candidate Voted Against the Civil Rights ...
The Sharon Statement of 1960 and Goldwater's Presidential Nomination in ...
Which Term Refers to Human Communication Designed to Influence Others ...