Asked by Beatriz Castro on Jun 24, 2024

verifed

Verified

Why did the Supreme Court rule that the Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional?

A) The act attempted to impose prior restraint on newspapers.
B) The act violated the First Amendment's right to freedom of assembly.
C) The act granted too much authority to the executive branch and therefore violated the separation of powers.
D) The act attempted to protect children by suppressing speech that adults have a constitutional right to receive.

Communications Decency Act

A law enacted by the United States Congress in 1996 to regulate pornography and protect minors from harmful online content, although many of its provisions were later struck down by courts.

Prior Restraint

A legal measure in which the government prohibits certain expressions or information from being made public, often challenged as unconstitutional.

Unconstitutional

Actions or laws that are deemed to violate the Constitution or constitutional principles.

  • Appraise the legal and constitutional dialogues surrounding the extent and limitations of civil rights.
  • Acquire knowledge of the procedures and benchmarks for evaluating the legality of laws pertaining to civil liberties.
verifed

Verified Answer

AV
Anjel VernonJun 30, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The Supreme Court ruled that the Communications Decency Act was unconstitutional because it attempted to protect children by suppressing speech that adults have a constitutional right to receive, which violated the First Amendment's right to freedom of speech. The Court held that the government may not regulate the content of speech on the Internet in the same way it regulates broadcasting or other media. The Court recognized that the Internet is a unique and evolving medium that deserves the highest protection under the First Amendment.