Asked by madelyn brock on Apr 25, 2024

verifed

Verified

Who would hold that public money spent on the allocation of medical resources could be spent unequally, provided that this inequality worked to the benefit of the least well-off?

A) Ross
B) Rawls
C) Kant
D) Nussbaum

Medical Resources

The various types of health services, supplies, and equipment available for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases and injuries.

Rawls

Refers to John Rawls, an American political philosopher noted for his work in moral and political philosophy, especially in the theory of justice as fairness.

Ross

Likely refers to W.D. Ross, a philosopher known for his contributions to ethical theory, particularly the concept of prima facie duties.

  • Analyze the ethical considerations regarding the allocation of medical resources.
verifed

Verified Answer

AP
Adeline Plath

Apr 27, 2024

Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Rawls would argue for a system of distributive justice that works to benefit the least well-off members of society. He believed that inequality can be permissible if it results in greater benefits for those who are worse off. Therefore, he would hold that public money spent on the allocation of medical resources could be spent unequally if it worked to the benefit of the least well-off.