Asked by Nadine Clark on Jul 01, 2024

verifed

Verified

Which statement is most consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling in Schenck v. U.S.?

A) The government's seizure and operation of the railroad industry is a constitutional use of its wartime powers.
B) The government's prohibition of the manufacture and sale of distilled liquor is a constitutional use of its wartime powers.
C) The government can restrict the First Amendment right to free speech in time of war.
D) The government has the power to compel young men to serve in the armed forces during time of war.

Schenck V. U.S.

A landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in 1919 that established the 'clear and present danger' test for restrictions on free speech in the context of national security.

First Amendment

Part of the Bill of Rights, it protects freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition in the United States.

Wartime Powers

Wartime powers are special authorities granted to government leaders and bodies to take extraordinary measures for managing and conducting military operations, maintaining national security, and stabilizing the economy during periods of war.

  • Analyze the legal and civil liberty challenges during WWI, including the Schenck v. U.S. case.
verifed

Verified Answer

AE
Armen EyssakahanianJul 03, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The ruling in Schenck v. U.S. established the principle that the government can restrict the First Amendment right to free speech in time of war if the speech presents a clear and present danger to the country. This is known as the "clear and present danger" test. Options A, B, and D do not apply to the ruling in this case.