Asked by Bryanna Brace on Jun 30, 2024

verifed

Verified

Which of the following would always be considered to be contrary to public policy?

A) A contract which contains a covenant not to compete.
B) A contract offered on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
C) An agreement to pay someone to make false statements about a competitor's product.
D) An agreement which contains an exculpatory clause.

Public Policy

Government policies developed to address issues of public concern, influenced by the public's values and goals.

Exculpatory Clause

A clause in a contract that exempts a party from responsibility for any damages that occur while the contract is being carried out.

False Statements

A statement that is not true or does not accurately reflect reality.

  • Identify arrangements and contracts that breach legal boundaries and oppose public interests.
verifed

Verified Answer

ZK
Zybrea KnightJul 03, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
An agreement to pay someone to make false statements about a competitor's product is always considered to be contrary to public policy because it involves committing an act of fraud or defamation, which is illegal and harmful to the public interest.