Asked by madisyn collier on Jul 27, 2024
Verified
Which of the following statements with regard to the tort of negligence is false?
A) If a person is injured by a defective product that he himself did not purchase, he can sue the manufacturer for negligence.
B) To win his negligence case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed him a duty of care, was below the standard of care the law requires, and thus caused him foreseeable damage.
C) In most provinces, the standard of care imposed on an occupier has been modified by statute.
D) For a person to completely escape liability for negligence on the grounds that the plaintiff volunteered to take the risk, the court would have to find that the plaintiff volunteered to accept the physical risk and the legal consequences as well.
E) In negligence cases, the special provision of res ipsa loquitor must always be applied in order to establish liability.
Duty of Care
A legal obligation to adhere to a standard of reasonable care while performing acts that could foreseeably cause harm to others.
Res Ipsa Loquitor
A legal doctrine allowing the presumption of negligence by the defendant when the accident could not have happened without negligence.
Defective Product
An item that fails to function as intended due to a flaw in design, manufacture, or marketing, presenting potential harm to users.
- Comprehend the fundamental principles and protective strategies associated with negligence in tort law.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the fundamental principles and protective strategies associated with negligence in tort law.
Related questions
Raheel Wants to Sue a Manufacturer Who He Believes Was ...
Which of the Following Is True with Respect to the ...
Which of the Following Statements with Regard to the Tort ...
In Which of the Following Would the Plaintiff Not Succeed ...
Which of the Following Statements Best Describes the Standard Used ...