Asked by dylan lucero on Jun 09, 2024
Verified
Which of the following statements best expresses the Supreme Court's ruling in Coronado Coal Company v. United Mine Workers?
A) A striking union can be prosecuted for illegal restraint of trade.
B) A corporation can be prosecuted for directing a hired security force to use violence against a striking union.
C) A corporation can be prosecuted for not allowing its workers to organize into a union.
D) A striking union can be prosecuted for encouraging violent tactics.
Coronado Coal Company
A historical coal mining company in the United States, known for its involvement in early 20th-century labor disputes and coal industry developments.
Illegal Restraint
A legal term referring to any action or practice that restricts trade or the free movement of goods, services, or people unlawfully.
United Mine Workers
A labor union that represents coal miners in the United States and Canada, founded in 1890, advocating for improved working conditions and wages.
- Comprehend the repercussions of political and judicial rulings on the economic and social fabric of American society in the 1920s.
- Examine the impact of legal and legislative developments on the rights and status of various groups within American society during the 1920s.
Verified Answer
KA
Kemlys AndrewsJun 12, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The Supreme Court's ruling in Coronado Coal Company v. United Mine Workers established that a striking union could be prosecuted for illegal restraint of trade, reflecting the application of antitrust laws to labor activities during that period.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the repercussions of political and judicial rulings on the economic and social fabric of American society in the 1920s.
- Examine the impact of legal and legislative developments on the rights and status of various groups within American society during the 1920s.