Asked by Jackson Levine on May 06, 2024
Verified
Which of the following has been recognized by the courts as a possible justification for tying agreements?
A) The tying product functions properly only if used with the tied product.
B) The tying product is not available for purchase without the agreement.
C) The tying agreement involves two separate and distinct items.
D) The seller is the market leader in both the tying and tied product categories.
Tying Agreement
A sales practice in which the seller conditions the sale of one product on the purchase of another product.
Justification
A reason, fact, circumstance, or explanation that validates or defends an action, decision, or belief.
Market Leader
A company or brand that has the highest sales or market share in a particular industry, sector, or market.
- Determine the factors and legal outcomes associated with tying arrangements and vertical price regulation.
Verified Answer
RF
Rojeen FazeliMay 10, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Some courts have recognized that tying agreements sometimes may be necessary to protect the reputation of the seller's product line.For example,the tying product of the seller functions properly only if used with the tied product.
Learning Objectives
- Determine the factors and legal outcomes associated with tying arrangements and vertical price regulation.
Related questions
Which of the Following Situations Is Most Likely a Case ...
As Demonstrated in Suture Express Inc ...
Bony CorpRequires Retailers and Wholesalers That Purchase Bony's $200 Videocassette ...
The Manufacturer of Rubberware Agrees to Sell the Distributor 1,000 ...
Three of the Airline Companies Agree That They Will Not ...