Asked by Ranjot Bains on May 10, 2024
Verified
Which of the following best expresses the Supreme Court's decision in Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge?
A) State governments have final authority over transportation routes within their boundaries.
B) New enterprises cannot be restrained by privileges that were implied under old charters.
C) The original grant of power in a state contract is to be interpreted as broad and unlimited.
D) The federal government has final authority over transportation routes that cross state boundaries.
Charles River Bridge
refers to a historical case, Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge (1837), in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on issues of competition and public convenience regarding charter rights.
Old Charters
Documents representing the earliest forms of incorporation for colonies, companies, universities, and cities, outlining their rights, privileges, and organizational structure.
State Governments
The governing bodies of each of the 50 states in the United States, responsible for local legislation and administration.
- Detect and fathom essential constitutional dilemmas and impediments in the early 19th century.
- Assess the effects of technological and industrial innovations on the early American societal structure.
Verified Answer
ZK
Zybrea KnightMay 10, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The Supreme Court's decision in Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge established that new enterprises cannot be restrained by privileges that were implied under old charters, as this would hinder economic development and progress. The ruling favored Warren Bridge, as it allowed them to build a new bridge parallel to an existing one owned by Charles River Bridge, even though the latter had been granted a monopoly over the transportation route.
Learning Objectives
- Detect and fathom essential constitutional dilemmas and impediments in the early 19th century.
- Assess the effects of technological and industrial innovations on the early American societal structure.