Asked by Abhishek Kulkarni on Apr 25, 2024
Verified
Which of the following best describes the verdict of the 1915 Mutual case?
A) Movies are not subject to First Amendment constitutional protections because they are an entertaining "social force," unlike the press.
B) Movies are subject to the currents of a free market system; the purchasing decisions of consumers will decide who or what is objectionable.
C) Movies are protected by the First Amendment but can be censored by individual municipalities via the legal mechanism of states' rights.
D) Movies are protected by the First Amendment, but studios should continue their practice of self-censorship in order to ensure the production of morally uplifting material for the public's consumption.
First Amendment
The amendment to the United States Constitution that guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.
Constitutional Protections
Safeguards provided by a constitution to protect individual rights and freedoms from infringement by the government or other entities.
- Comprehend the significance of early cinema in its evolution from a novelty to a widespread cultural phenomenon.
Verified Answer
GP
Gleizl PelayreMay 02, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The 1915 Mutual case concluded that movies were not protected under the First Amendment because they were seen primarily as a business and an entertainment medium, not a form of "press" or political expression.
Learning Objectives
- Comprehend the significance of early cinema in its evolution from a novelty to a widespread cultural phenomenon.
Related questions
Which of the Following Facilitated Film's Transition from a Novelty ...
An Ethnic-Religious Divide Partially Defined the Adversarial Relationship Between Social ...
If You Were to Make a Film About the 21st ...
How Did the Early Film Industry React to the Figure ...
Directed by Alice Guy Blaché, This Film Is Considered the ...