What is the unstated conclusion in the following syllogism? Anyone who drives a car across the police department lawn is looking for trouble.That's what Mitch did last night.

A) Mitch is a police officer.
B) Mitch was arrested last night.
C) Mitch owns a car.
D) Mitch was looking for trouble.
E) Mitch has a driver's license.

The premise states that anyone who drives a car across the police department lawn is looking for trouble. The second premise states that Mitch did drive his car across the police department lawn. Therefore, the unstated conclusion is that Mitch was looking for trouble. Option D is the correct conclusion. The other options are either irrelevant or not supported by the given syllogism.