Asked by Meegan Rossier on Jun 03, 2024
Verified
What did the Supreme Court justices declare in Miller v.Johnson (1995) ?
A) Districts could not be drawn to favor the incumbent candidate.
B) The racial composition of a district could not be the predominant factor when redistricting.
C) It was not unconstitutional for states to use an unelected,nonpartisan committee
To redistrict.
D) The use of computer technologies to draw districts that would favor one party over another is unconstitutional.
Miller V.Johnson
A landmark Supreme Court case that dealt with race and redistricting, setting limits on the use of race in district drawing.
Redistricting
The process of drawing electoral district boundaries, often following a census, to ensure equal representation.
- Know the procedures and outcomes of redistricting, including Supreme Court rulings and their significance.
Verified Answer
FM
Fernanda MorenoJun 10, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
The Supreme Court justices declared in Miller v. Johnson (1995) that the racial composition of a district could not be the predominant factor when redistricting. In other words, redistricting cannot be based solely on race or ethnicity to benefit a particular political party or racial group.
Learning Objectives
- Know the procedures and outcomes of redistricting, including Supreme Court rulings and their significance.
Related questions
The Process of Allocating Congressional Seats Among the 50 States ...
The Drawing of Legislative District Boundaries in Order to Give ...
In Addition to Gerrymandering,a Major Reason Why So Many Members ...
Each Supreme Court Justice Is Assigned ________ Law Clerks
Under Normal Rules of Oral Argument,each Lawyer Has ________ to ...