Westdress,Inc.entered into a contract with Salvo,Inc.to supply them with specified goods by June 15^th.Salvo,Inc.shipped the goods,which were delivered to Westdress,Inc.on May 30^th.Westdress inspected the goods,found 50% of the goods to be nonconforming to their order,but kept them without notifying the seller of the discrepancy.In the meantime,Salvo,Inc.realized its error and contacted Westdress to replace the goods,but Westdress refused the offer.Discuss the case.

As a seller,Salvo has the right to cure the defect and make a proper tender within the contract time.However,this right does not exist when Westdress accepts the nonconforming goods,even though Westdress can later sue Salvo for breach of contract.In any case,sellers have a duty to notify buyers that they are going to cure the improper tender or delivery,which Salvo,Inc.has already done.The court is likely to allow Salvo an additional amount of time to substitute a conforming tender,since Salvo has reasonable grounds to believe that the goods that were delivered were acceptable.