Asked by Jeffrey Matikainen on Jul 07, 2024



Unwilling group members can display counterproductive behavior. Discuss three ways a leader can handle disruptive behavior, and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Disruptive Behavior

Actions that disturb or interfere with normal operations in a setting, such as a workplace or school.

  • Determine and detail the responsibilities and behaviors of team members, highlighting actions that hinder progress and detrimental attitudes.
  • Describe the critical roles and methodologies a group leader employs in controlling group dynamics and in the attainment of group objectives.

Verified Answer

Zybrea Knight

1 week ago

Final Answer :
1. Address the issue privately: One approach a leader can take is to address the disruptive behavior privately with the individual or individuals involved. This allows the leader to have a one-on-one conversation to understand the root cause of the behavior and work towards finding a solution. The advantage of this approach is that it can help maintain the individual's dignity and prevent them from feeling publicly embarrassed. However, the disadvantage is that it may not address the underlying issue if the individual is not willing to open up or change their behavior.

2. Set clear expectations and consequences: Another approach is for the leader to set clear expectations for behavior within the group and communicate the consequences of disruptive behavior. This can help create a sense of accountability and encourage individuals to think twice before engaging in counterproductive behavior. The advantage of this approach is that it establishes boundaries and can help prevent future disruptions. However, the disadvantage is that it may create a tense or punitive atmosphere within the group if not handled carefully.

3. Provide support and guidance: A leader can also take a more supportive approach by providing guidance and support to the individual displaying disruptive behavior. This can involve offering resources or assistance to help address any underlying issues that may be contributing to the behavior. The advantage of this approach is that it can help the individual feel valued and supported, potentially leading to positive changes in behavior. However, the disadvantage is that it may require a significant investment of time and resources from the leader, and there is no guarantee that the individual will respond positively.

In conclusion, each approach to handling disruptive behavior has its own advantages and disadvantages. It is important for a leader to carefully consider the specific situation and the individuals involved in order to determine the most effective approach. Additionally, a combination of these approaches may be necessary in some cases to effectively address and manage disruptive behavior within a group.