Thinking back to previous chapters, compare the writings and influence of the Progressive Simon Patten with the Gilded Age social theorists like Henry George and Edward Bellamy. How did each define freedom? How did each view the future of America?

Progressive Simon Patten, a prominent economist and social theorist, differed from Gilded Age social theorists like Henry George and Edward Bellamy in his writings and influence. Patten focused on the idea of progress and social change, advocating for government intervention to address social and economic issues. In contrast, George and Bellamy were more critical of the existing economic and social structures, advocating for radical reforms.

In terms of defining freedom, Patten emphasized the importance of economic freedom and the ability for individuals to pursue their own interests and opportunities. He believed that a strong economy and government intervention were necessary to ensure freedom for all members of society. On the other hand, George and Bellamy focused on the idea of economic equality and the redistribution of wealth as a means to achieve true freedom for all individuals.

In terms of the future of America, Patten believed in the potential for progress and social change through government intervention and economic development. He saw a future where individuals could pursue their own interests and opportunities, leading to a more prosperous and equitable society. In contrast, George and Bellamy were more critical of the existing economic and social structures, envisioning a future where wealth and power were more evenly distributed among all members of society.

Overall, Patten's writings and influence as a Progressive economist focused on the potential for progress and social change through government intervention and economic development, while Gilded Age social theorists like Henry George and Edward Bellamy focused on the need for radical reforms to achieve economic equality and true freedom for all individuals.