Asked by Avnish Jauhal on Jun 07, 2024
Verified
The Warren Court's decisions in the Mapp and Miranda cases
A) put a crippling burden on law enforcement officials.
B) were overwhelmingly supported by the public.
C) were used as part of a law-and-order campaign by Richard Nixon.
D) have significantly reduced the number of criminal confessions.
Warren Court
The period in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States during which Earl Warren served as Chief Justice, noted for its landmark decisions on civil rights, separation of church and state, and police procedure.
Mapp
Refers to Mapp v. Ohio, a landmark Supreme Court case in 1961 that established the exclusionary rule's application to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Miranda
Refers to the Miranda rights, a set of legal protections in the United States that must be read to a suspect before questioning, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney.
- Acknowledge the ongoing struggle and progression of civil rights and civil liberties within American history.
- Grasp the essentiality of notable Supreme Court verdicts in molding criminal protocol and individual privileges.
Verified Answer
CT
Courtney ThompsonJun 14, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
The Warren Court's decisions in the Mapp v. Ohio and Miranda v. Arizona cases were controversial for expanding the rights of the accused, and Richard Nixon used public concern over these decisions as part of his law-and-order campaign to gain political support.
Learning Objectives
- Acknowledge the ongoing struggle and progression of civil rights and civil liberties within American history.
- Grasp the essentiality of notable Supreme Court verdicts in molding criminal protocol and individual privileges.