Asked by Aaron Mashore on Jul 04, 2024

verifed

Verified

The process of ratifying the Constitution generated extensive disagreements between Federalists and Antifederalists.Discuss three issues that divided the Federalists and Antifederalists during the ratification debate and summarize each side's arguments on these issues.

Federalists

Advocates for a strong central government and supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in the late 18th century, as opposed to anti-federalists who favored stronger state governments.

Antifederalists

Political figures and activists in early American history who opposed the creation of a strong federal government, advocating instead for states' rights and a decentralized political structure.

Ratification Debate

The intense public and political discourse that took place during the process of ratifying the United States Constitution, with Federalists advocating for it and Anti-Federalists opposing it.

  • Acquire knowledge about the differing opinions and arguments between Federalists and Antifederalists on the subject of the national government's powers and structure.
verifed

Verified Answer

HM
Hayley MendozaJul 10, 2024
Final Answer :
There are three components to this question.
a.Representation: One major area of contention between the two sides was representation.Antifederalists asserted that representatives must be "a true picture of the people." They argued this could be achieved only in small,relatively homogeneous republics such as the existing states.Federalists saw no reason that representatives should be precisely like those they represented.In their view,one of the great advantages of representative government was precisely the possibility that the people would choose as their representatives individuals possessing ability,experience,and talent superior to their own.
b.Tyranny: A second important issue was the threat of tyranny.From the Antifederalist perspective,the greatest danger was that the few would use their power to tyrannize the many.For this reason,Antifederalists were critical of the unelected institutions in the Constitution (such as the Senate,the executive,and the federal judiciary).The Federalists were fearful of majority tyranny.From the Federalist perspective,it was precisely those features of the Constitution that the Antifederalists attacked as potential sources of tyranny that actually offered the best hope of averting the threat of oppression.
c.Governmental power: A third major difference was the issue of governmental power.Antifederalists favored limiting and enumerating the powers granted to the national government in relation both to the states and to the people at large.Antifederalists also demanded that a bill of rights be added to the Constitution to place limits on the government's power.Federalists favored the construction of a government with broad powers to defend the nation against foreign foes,guard against domestic strife and insurrection,promote commerce,and expand the nation's economy.