The only type of regulation and management of the media through government law seems to be endorsed by the media industry when it benefits the industry; do you agree?
A. If yes, why do you agree? Is this just another example of businesses trying to survive by getting the most protection as possible without consequence or is this greed? Could it be both? Explain your answer.
B. If no, why do you disagree?

Yes, I agree that the media industry tends to endorse government regulation and management only when it benefits them. This can be seen as a form of self-preservation, as businesses often seek to protect their interests and ensure their survival. However, it can also be viewed as a form of greed, as the industry may prioritize their own profits and success over the potential consequences of excessive regulation. In reality, it is likely a combination of both factors. The media industry, like any other business, seeks to thrive and protect itself, but this can sometimes lead to actions that prioritize their own interests over the greater good. Ultimately, it is a complex issue with no easy answers.

B: N/A