The "Baby Fae" case shows that

A) the establishment of research ethics boards by itself cannot prevent unethical research practices.
B) animal-to-human organ transplants are feasible.
C) parents may not have their babies' best interests in mind when they make medical decisions.
D) doctors discriminate against disabled infants.
E) euthanasia of seriously disabled infants should be considered seriously.

The "Baby Fae" case involved the transplant of a baboon heart into a human infant. The case highlighted the limitations of research ethics in regulating experimentation on humans and the need for greater oversight. The baby's parents agreed to the experimental procedure, indicating that parents may not always act in the best interests of their children. The case also demonstrated the risks and ethical complexities of animal-to-human organ transplants but did not support the idea of euthanasia for disabled infants.