Asked by Hayley Brown on May 18, 2024

verifed

Verified

Suppose that a syllogism has four terms: uncommunicative people, communicative people, Ruth, and people who make friends easily.Can the rules of validity determine whether or not the syllogism is valid?

A) Yes, but only after immediate inference is used to collapse the first two terms into one.
B) Yes, but only after immediate inference is used to expand the number of terms to six.
C) Yes, the rules can be applied without first making any changes to the syllogism.
D) No, because it is impossible to put the syllogism into standard form.
E) No, because the rules of validity cannot be used when one of the terms is a proper name.

Immediate Inference

A process in deductive reasoning that involves deriving a conclusion from a single premise without the need for additional premises.

Valid Syllogism

A form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion that logically follows from the premises.

  • Differentiate between correct and incorrect syllogisms by examining their form and substance.
  • Improve the competence to spot and amend illogical arguments involving undistributed middle, illicit major or minor terms, and the fallacious transition from negative premises to affirmative conclusions or the opposite.
verifed

Verified Answer

BH
Belana HannulaMay 23, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
The syllogism has four terms, but the rules of validity require that syllogisms have only three terms. Therefore, we must use immediate inference to collapse the first two terms into one before applying the rules of validity. In this case, we could collapse "uncommunicative people" and "communicative people" into simply "people." Once we have done this, we can apply the rules of validity to determine whether the syllogism is valid.