Asked by Sewisha Thabo Lehong on Jun 08, 2024

verifed

Verified

Smith, Jones, and Brown incorporated XYZ Ltd. The three were sole shareholders, directors, officers, and employees. Jones and Brown disliked working with Smith. They knew he was good for the business, but they disliked his personality and politics. After a year, Jones and Brown, as directors, removed Smith as an officer and employee and raised their own salaries as employees. They then voted Smith out as a director at the next shareholders' meeting. Which one of the following provisions would aid Smith?

A) Relief-from-oppression provisions
B) Pre-emptive right provisions
C) Indoor-management rule
D) Derivative-action provisions
E) Dissent procedures

Relief-From-Oppression Provisions

These provisions within corporate law allow minority shareholders to petition a court for relief against actions by the majority shareholders that are oppressive or unfairly prejudicial to their interests.

Shareholders' Meeting

A gathering of company shareholders for the purpose of discussing company affairs and making decisions on corporate matters.

Sole Shareholders

Sole shareholders are individuals or entities that own 100% of a company's shares, giving them full control over the business's decisions and profits.

  • Understand the legal provisions available to shareholders for dealing with breaches of duty and securing their interests within a corporation.
  • Comprehend the notion of a closely held corporation along with the distinct legal considerations and protections it is subject to.
verifed

Verified Answer

RP
Romario PhippsJun 13, 2024
Final Answer :
A
Explanation :
Relief-from-oppression provisions are designed to protect minority shareholders from actions by the majority shareholders or directors that are oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, or that unfairly disregard the interests of any shareholder. In this scenario, Smith, as a minority shareholder who has been removed as an officer, employee, and director in a manner that could be seen as oppressive or unfairly prejudicial, would benefit from such provisions.