Asked by kenyana jones on Jun 25, 2024

verifed

Verified

Scuba Diving.Marcy invented a new type of mask for scuba divers that was not subject to fogging.She agrees to allow Jenny to manufacture and sell the mask.She receives a sum of money for every mask that Jenny sells.Similarly,Marcy entered into an agreement with Frank to allow him to sell the masks,but only if he also purchased non-patented diving suits from Marcy.All parties proceeded to do very well with their sales.Which of the following describes the agreement between Marcy and Frank?

A) It is a legal tying arrangement.
B) It is a legal cross-licensing agreement.
C) It is an illegal tying arrangement.
D) It is an illegal cross-licensing agreement.
E) It is both a legal tying and a legal cross-licensing agreement.

Tying Arrangement

An illegal agreement in which the sale of one product is tied to the sale of another.

Cross-Licensing Agreement

An arrangement where two or more parties grant each other rights to intellectual property, often to use patents without suing for infringement.

Legal Tying

Refers to a potentially prohibited practice where a seller requires the purchase of an unwanted item or service in order to buy the desired item.

  • Comprehend the various categories of intellectual property law, such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.
  • Understand the foundational concepts of trade secret protection and the criteria necessary for its preservation.
verifed

Verified Answer

BC
Brynn ChaseJun 30, 2024
Final Answer :
C
Explanation :
A patent holder may not use the patent for an illegal purpose.The two most common illegal purposes are tying arrangements and cross-licensing.A tying arrangement occurs when the holder issues a license to use the patented object only if the licensee agrees to buy some non-patented product from the holder.Cross-licensing occurs when two patent holders license each other to use their patents only on the condition that neither licenses anyone else to use his or her patent without the other's consent.Both of these activities are unlawful because they tend to reduce competition.