Asked by Hannah Brown on Jun 09, 2024

verifed

Verified

Research participants and research staff are unaware of which participants received a placebo and which participants received an actual drug.This illustrates

A) naturalistic observation.
B) the testing effect.
C) a confounding variable.
D) the double-blind procedure.

Double-Blind Procedure

An experimental method in which neither the participants nor the experimenters know who is receiving a particular treatment, to reduce bias.

Placebo

A compound that does not produce any healing outcomes, utilized as a comparison standard when examining the efficacy of new medications.

Research Participants

Research Participants are individuals who take part in scientific studies, providing data through their responses or behavior for analysis.

  • Analyze the necessity of the double-blind procedure in maintaining objectivity in experiments.
verifed

Verified Answer

EB
Elloise BrejonioJun 16, 2024
Final Answer :
D
Explanation :
The scenario described is an example of the double-blind procedure, where both the research participants and staff are unaware of which participants received a placebo and which received an actual drug. This helps to eliminate bias and placebo effects in the study. A is incorrect as naturalistic observation involves observing behavior in a natural setting without manipulating any variables. B is incorrect as the testing effect refers to the improvement in performance that results from being tested or assessed, which is not relevant to the scenario described. C is incorrect as a confounding variable refers to a variable that affects both the independent and dependent variables, potentially leading to invalid results in a study. The scenario described does not involve a confounding variable.