Asked by Kassandra Bougades on Jul 15, 2024

verifed

Verified

Provide an example of a measure that is reliable but not valid. How would this affect research conclusions?

Reliable

The quality of being consistently good in quality or performance; able to be trusted.

Valid

Confirming to the truth or fact; logically sound and recognized as legitimate or acceptable.

  • Grasp the concepts of reliability and validity in research, including their differences and impact on research outcomes.
verifed

Verified Answer

JD
JENNIE DEVALLONJul 17, 2024
Final Answer :
An example of a measure that is reliable but not valid is a bathroom scale that is consistently off by 5 pounds. If you were to weigh yourself multiple times throughout the day or on different days, the scale might consistently give you a reading that is 5 pounds heavier than your true weight. This consistency in the readings indicates that the scale is reliable—it gives you the same result under the same conditions. However, because the scale is not accurately reflecting your true weight, it is not valid.

In research, reliability refers to the consistency or repeatability of a measure. A reliable measure yields the same results under consistent conditions. Validity, on the other hand, refers to the accuracy of a measure, or the extent to which it measures what it is supposed to measure.

When a measure is reliable but not valid, it can lead to consistent but incorrect conclusions. In research, this could mean that any inferences or theories developed based on the data from the unreliable measure could be flawed. For example, if a psychological test consistently measures something other than what it is intended to measure, any conclusions drawn about the psychological construct of interest would be inaccurate. This could lead to ineffective interventions, misguided policy decisions, or incorrect theoretical understandings.

In the case of the bathroom scale, if a researcher were using this scale to measure weight loss in a study, they might consistently record weight loss or gain that is 5 pounds off from the true value. If the researcher is unaware of the scale's lack of validity, they might conclude that a diet or exercise program is more or less effective than it actually is.

Therefore, it is crucial for researchers to ensure that their measures are not only reliable but also valid. This often involves a thorough process of testing and validation, including comparing the measure against established benchmarks, using multiple methods to assess the same construct, and continually refining the measure to improve its accuracy. Without both reliability and validity, research findings may be built on a shaky foundation, leading to questionable conclusions and potentially undermining the credibility of the research.