Asked by Bailey Goodman on Jun 18, 2024
Verified
Price-fixing
A) creative destruction view of competition.
B) idea that competition leads to greater economic efficiency than does a monopoly.
C) view that nonprice competition should be strictly regulated by government.
D) view that all negative externalities should be eliminated by government action.
Price-Fixing
An illegal agreement among competitors to set prices at a certain level, rather than letting them be determined naturally by supply and demand.
Economic Efficiency
A state in which resources are allocated in a way that maximizes the production of goods and services at the lowest cost, while achieving the highest possible welfare or utility.
Negative Externalities
Costs experienced by third parties due to the actions of others that are not reflected in market prices.
- Analyze the historical and legal groundwork of antitrust policies and their updates, encompassing the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, and Celler-Kefauver Act.
Verified Answer
FA
Fatin AsyiqinJun 20, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Price-fixing contradicts the idea that competition leads to greater economic efficiency than does a monopoly, as it artificially controls prices, reducing the benefits of competitive markets.
Learning Objectives
- Analyze the historical and legal groundwork of antitrust policies and their updates, encompassing the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, and Celler-Kefauver Act.