Asked by Jeremy Kennedy on Apr 29, 2024

verifed

Verified

Personal, social, professional, and political problems involving diverging ethical imperatives can be emotionally and intellectually difficult to resolve. Strong critical thinkers approach those challenges mindful that reasonable people ________.

A) will never come to agreement
B) can disagree
C) almost always agree
D) agree unless they are being unreasonable

Ethical Imperatives

Moral obligations or principles that guide individuals' actions in accordance with what is considered right or just.

Critical Thinkers

Individuals who actively and skillfully conceptualize, apply, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information to reach a conclusion.

Reasonable People

Individuals who exercise average care, skill, and judgment in conduct and who are presumed to have a certain level of knowledge when making decisions.

  • Fathom the importance of ethical guidance in making decisions and facing dilemmas within personal, social, professional, and political landscapes.
verifed

Verified Answer

GB
gizeal bahatiMay 02, 2024
Final Answer :
B
Explanation :
Strong critical thinkers understand that it is possible for reasonable people to disagree on ethical issues, and this understanding helps them navigate complex problems involving diverging ethical imperatives. Option A is incorrect because although agreement may not always be possible, it is not reasonable to assume that reasonable people can never come to agreement. Option C is also incorrect because it is not realistic to expect that almost everyone will agree on ethical issues. Option D is incorrect because it assumes that disagreement is a sign of being unreasonable, which is not necessarily true.